Tag Archives: Guardians of the Galaxy

Interstellar review

I tried. I honestly tried. I never meant to see Interstellar, because I already knew that I would hate it – and, more to the point, I already knew why I would hate it. That said, it’s comparatively lukewarm reception does indicate something of a turning point in Christopher Nolan’s career, and perhaps makes this a good moment to recap my reasoning.

lincoln-steven-spielberg-daniel-day-lewis

Grouchy, yet lovable

Part of the film’s fundamental awkwardness may be down to the fact that it was originally intended as a Stephen Spielberg movie, broken fragments of which are still visible. John Lithgow is awkwardly cast as a stock Spielberg type – a salt-of-the-earth, blue-collar love-bundle. Good old, grouchy-yet-lovable gramps is supposed to project a homely warmth, serving as a stable, loving core for Murphy’s family, but this is totally at odds with Lithgow’s signature style of effete, uppity aloofness. “It’s unnatural to eat popcorn at a ballgame. I wanna hotdog,” he grouches at one point, sounding for all the world like a man who’s never tasted either.

Continue reading

Advertisements

BULLETIN: Marvel like their women like they like their CGI – mainly in the background

Kevin Feige, president of Marvel Studios, would like everyone to know that he’s super-excited about the idea of a big budget movie based around a female central character, and also that he has no plans to make one in the foreseeable future. His comments to Comic Book Resources were provoked by a commendably direct question, which led to a predictably chickenshit answer:

Nice hairline, Feige

Nice hairline, Feige. Did I say hairline? I meant hat. Feige.

“I think it comes down to timing, which is what I’ve sort of always said, and it comes down to us being able to tell the right story. I very much believe in doing it. I very much believe that it’s unfair to say, “People don’t want to see movies with female heroes,” then list five movies that were not very good, therefore, people didn’t go to the movies because they weren’t good movies, versus [because] they were female leads. And they don’t mention “Hunger Games,” “Frozen,” “Divergent.” You can go back to “Kill Bill” or “Aliens.” These are all female-led movies. It can certainly be done. I hope we do it sooner rather than later. But we find ourselves in the very strange position of managing more franchises than most people have — which is a very, very good thing and we don’t take for granted, but is a challenging thing. You may notice from those release dates, we have three for 2017. And that’s because just the timing worked on what was sort of gearing up. But it does mean you have to put one franchise on hold for three or four years in order to introduce a new one? I don’t know. Those are the kinds of chess matches we’re playing right now.”

Feige naturally sidesteps the actual question, by making it sound as if Marvel’s schedule of upcoming movies had simply been found down the back of a sofa, or carved on a stone tablet by the invisible finger of God. Every item on their filmmaking agenda has, of course, been carefully thought out by the studio’s top dogs, following Feige’s lead. The exclusion of female characters from the centre-ring is not the product of “timing,” and certainly not of audience demand as he gutlessly suggests. It represents a series of calculated creative and financial decisions made by Marvel as a company.

As many have observed, it’s an especially bizarre lapse considering that Marvel has already featured Scarlett Johansson – one of the world’s least talented but most bankable female stars – as a secondary character in three separate films. As they reach further and further out into left field in search of fresh material, it’s only going to get bizarre-er. As Feige himself points out:

“…as we go further in upcoming movies, it just gives us, again, a broader canvas to play with…to tell all the stories that the comics have been telling for years and years and years. I think the notion that the cinematic universe consists of something as real world as a billionaire who used to make weapons and wants to repent that in Tony Stark’s story, or something as out there as Peter Quill, who now adventuring on the other side of the galaxy with a maniac, two thugs and an assassin…”Ant-Man” is a more contained sort of character, heist movie. And then, when “Dr. Strange” comes about, that, I hope, will start to broaden the canvas and expose the canvas even more into the supernatural side, into that undercurrent of magic which is really sort of about alternate dimensions and parallel dimensions and that end of the comics.”

The only limits are the boundaries of our own imaginations! You were imagining another white guy with a six-pack too, right?

Bradshaw Watch – ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ (2014)

For anyone wondering why Peter Bradshaw gave Guardians of the Galaxy four stars in his Guardian review, here is a rundown of Peter’s thoughts on the film – excluding bluntly-stated plot details which could have been copy-pasted from Wikipedia:

guardians-of-the-galaxy-new-set-pictures+(1)– The film features a “retro playlist”. Peter has also seen the film X-Men: Days of Future Past, which had one too

– One of the film’s stars, Chris Pratt, was also in a TV show called Parks and Recreation

Peter has also seen a film called Star Wars, and thinks Chris Pratt’s character is a bit like Han Solo

– Peter is, or was once, acquainted with a “very prominent British producer” who explained to him that only big film studios can afford the copyright fees to use classic pop tunes

– The film’s environments put Peter in mind of “classic photorealist sci-fi paperback covers”

– Peter has read a book called The Lord of the Rings, and thinks the character of “Groot” – a giant, talking tree – is a bit like a character in that, who is also a giant, talking tree

– Peter is also familiar with the Christian Bible, and remembers the name “Gomorrah” from it

– The film also stars Vin Diesel, Dave Bautista, Zoe Saldana and Bradley Cooper

– The animated raccoon in the film reminded Peter of two other animated animals – Timon from The Lion King (who, he notes, was voiced by Nathan Lane), and “the meerkat in the TV advert who says ‘simples'”. On Peter’s behalf, I shall note here that the meerkat in question was called “Aleksandr Orlov,” and was voiced by Simon Greenall

– Peter feels that the film “pulls off the difficult trick of combining sprightly self-satire combined with that operatic self-belief that superhero stories need”. The insight here lies not in the sentence itself, but in its repetition of “combining” and “combined,” which indicates that Peter didn’t re-read even the last words he typed before filing his copy.

DO NOT BE FOOLED. IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO COUNTERFEIT FILM CRITICISM, CONTACT YOUR LOCAL POLICE STATION – OR LEAVE A TESTIMONIAL ON FLICKBOOK.WORDPRESS.COM